Share of wealth owned by the 400 richest Americans compared with the bottom 60 percent. The 400 richest Americans — the top 0.00025 percent of the population — have tripled their share of the nation’s wealth since the early 1980s. Data: Gabriel Zucman / World Inequality Database. Graphic: Christopher Ingraham / The Washington Post

By Christopher Ingraham
8 February 2019

(The Washington Post) – The 400 richest Americans — the top 0.00025 percent of the population — have tripled their share of the nation’s wealth since the early 1980s, according to a new working paper on wealth inequality by University of California at Berkeley economist Gabriel Zucman.

Those 400 Americans own more of the country’s riches than the 150 million adults in the bottom 60 percent of the wealth distribution, who saw their share of the nation’s wealth fall from 5.7 percent in 1987 to 2.1 percent in 2014, according to the World Inequality Database maintained by Zucman and others.

Overall, Zucman finds that “U.S. wealth concentration seems to have returned to levels last seen during the Roaring Twenties.” That shift is eroding security from families in the lower and middle classes, who rely on their small stores of wealth to finance their retirement and to smooth over economic shocks like the loss of a job. And it’s consolidating power in the hands of the nation’s billionaires, who are increasingly using their riches to purchase political influence.

Zucman, who advised Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) on a recent proposal to tax high levels of wealth, warns that these numbers may understate the amount of wealth concentrated in the hands of the rich: It has become more difficult to account for the true wealth of the ultra-rich in recent decades, in part because many hide their assets in offshore tax shelters. […]

American wealth is highly unevenly distributed, much more so than income. According to Zucman’s latest calculations, today the top 0.1 percent of the population has captured nearly 20 percent of the nation’s wealth, giving them a greater slice of the American pie than the bottom 80 percent of the population combined. That bottom 80 percent figure includes the 1 in 5 American households that has either zero or negative wealth, meaning that its debts are greater than or equal to its assets. According to NYU’s Wolff, the share of U.S. households with zero or negative wealth has risen by roughly one-third since 1983, when it was 15.5 percent.

The top 10 percent of individuals, meanwhile, own more than 70 percent of the nation’s wealth, more than twice the amount owned by the bottom 90 percent. The top 10 percent have increased their share of wealth by about 10 percentage points since the early 1980s, with a concomitant decline in the share of wealth owned by everyone else. In some ways, Zucman finds, the distribution of wealth in the United States more closely resembles the situation in Russia and China than in other advanced democracies such as the United Kingdom and France. […]

Weath share of the top 10 percent of individuals in the U.S., U.K., France, Russia, and China. Data: Gabriel Zucman / World Inequality Database. Graphic: Christopher Ingraham / The Washington Post

Rising wealth inequality may not necessarily be a zero-sum game: The rich gobbling up a larger share of the national wealth pie may not be a problem if there’s still more pie left for everyone else, relative to several years or decades ago. There’s good reason to suspect that this may be the case for income: While incomes at the top have risen dramatically over the past few decades, incomes in the middle have risen, too, albeit much more slowly.

But the same dynamic is not occurring with household wealth. According to Wolff, the median household wealth in the United States in 2016 ($78,100) was slightly lower, in inflation-adjusted dollars, than it was three decades ago in 1983 ($80,000). Over the same time period, the average wealth of the top 1 percent of households more than doubled, from $10.6 million to $26.4 million.

The wealthy are becoming wealthier, in other words, and there’s good reason to think it’s happening at the expense of everyone else. As Zucman notes, this has very different implications for different groups of people. “For everybody except the rich,” he writes, wealth’s “main function is to provide security.” Middle-class families tend to use their wealth to save for rainy-day expenses or to draw down on for retirement.

But “for the rich, wealth begets power,” according to Zucman. Our electoral system is highly dependent on outside financing, creating numerous opportunities for the wealthy to convert their money into influence and tip the political scales in their favor. As a result, politicians have become accustomed to playing close attention to the interests of the wealthy and passing policies that reflect them, even in cases where public opinion is strongly trending in the opposite direction.

“Wealth concentration may help explain the lack of redistributive responses to the rise of inequality observed since the 1980s,” Zucman writes. The interplay between money and power, in other words, may be self-reinforcing: The wealthy use their money to buy political power, and they use some of that power to protect their money. [more]

Wealth concentration returning to ‘levels last seen during the Roaring Twenties,’ according to new research


Share of American wealth owned by the top 1 percent, the top 0.1 percent, and the bottom 80 percent of U.S. adults. Data: Gabriel Zucman / World Inequality Database. Graphic: Christopher Ingraham / The Washington Post

ABSTRACT: This  article  reviews  the  recent  literature  on  the  dynamics  of  global  wealth  inequality.  I  first reconcile available estimates of wealth inequality in the United States. Both surveys and tax data show  that  wealth inequality  has  increased  dramatically  since  the  1980s,  with  a  top  1%  wealth share around 40% in 2016 vs. 25–30% in the 1980s. Second, I discuss the fast growing literature on  wealth  inequality  across the  world.  Evidence  points  towards  a  rise  in  global  wealth concentration:  for  China,  Europe,  and  the United  States  combined,  the  top  1%  wealth  share  has increased  from  28%  in  1980  to  33%  today,  while the  bottom  75%  share  hovered  around  10%. Recent  studies,  however,  may  under-estimate  the  level and  rise  of  inequality,  as  financial globalization  makes  it  increasingly  hard  to  measure  wealth  at  the top.  I  discuss  how  new  data sources  (leaks  from  financial  institutions,  tax  amnesties,  and  macroeconomic statistics  of  tax havens) can be leveraged to better capture the wealth of the rich.

Global Wealth Inequality [pdf]

0 comments :

 

Blog Template by Adam Every . Sponsored by Business Web Hosting Reviews