Box modeling of petrochemical VOC emissions in outdoor Los Angeles air and in buildings. (A and B) Evaluations of our two-compartment box model with ambient observations of individual VOCs measured at Pasadena, CA, in 2010. In (A), we input only emissions from fossil fuels (mobile + upstream sources) into the model and evaluate against outdoor data under “no chemistry” conditions; (B) is the same as (A) but with the addition of VCP emissions. (C and D) Comparison of our box model against indoor observations of residential/commercial buildings. In (C) we allow outdoor VOCs to age by 3 hours at [OH] = 1.5 × 106 molecules cm−3 in the model, typical of ambient conditions at the ground site; (D) is the same as (C) but with the addition of VCP emissions indoors. For all panels, points below the 1:1 line indicate that the box model underpredicts ambient or indoor concentrations relative to observations. Shown at the lower right of each panel is the mean relative bias and R2 of the model calculated in log space. Model statistics exclude aldehydes, which appear to be from other emission sources. Graphic: McDonald, et al., 2018 / Science

15 February 2018 (NOAA) – Emissions from volatile chemical products like perfumes, paints and other scented consumer items now rival vehicles as a pollution source in greater Los Angeles, according to a surprising new NOAA-led study.

Even though 15 times more petroleum is consumed as fuel than is used as ingredients in industrial and consumer products, the amount of chemical vapors emitted to the atmosphere in scented products is roughly the same, said lead author Brian McDonald, a CIRES scientist working at NOAA.

A paper presenting these study findings was published today in Science.

The chemical  vapors, known as volatile organic compounds or VOCs, react with sunlight to form ozone pollution, and, as this study finds, also react with other chemicals in the atmosphere to form fine particulates in the air.

“As the transportation sector gets cleaner, these other sources of VOCs become more and more important,” McDonald said. “A lot of stuff we use in our everyday lives can impact air pollution.”

Pollution sources then, and now

Since adoption of the Clean Air Act in 1970, air quality programs have focused on controlling transportation-related pollution emitted by everything from cars and trucks to oil and gas refineries. But McDonald and his colleagues couldn’t reconcile atmospheric measurements made over Los Angeles in 2010 with estimates of transportation emissions. So, they reassessed urban pollution sources by cataloging chemical production statistics, evaluating indoor air quality measurements made by others and then determining if the new information filled the gap.

All emissions are not created equal

The disproportionate air-quality impact of chemical products is because of a fundamental difference between those products and fuels, said NOAA atmospheric scientist Jessica Gilman, a co-author of the new paper.

Fuel systems minimize the loss of gasoline to evaporation in order to to maximize energy generated by combustion, she said. But common products like paints and perfumes are literally engineered to evaporate.

“Perfume and other scented products are designed so that you or your neighbor can enjoy the aroma,” Gilman said. “You don't do this with gasoline.”

A pollution source hiding in plain smell?

Gilman added that researchers studying the problem ended up taking a close look at things they once took for granted. “Some of my colleagues at NOAA literally spent days watching paint dry,” said said. “We learned a lot.”

While the focus of this study was Los Angeles, the authors believe the results are applicable to all major urban centers.

“We hope this study spurs collaboration between atmospheric scientists, chemical engineers and public health researchers, to deliver the best science to decision-makers,” said McDonald. “The strategies that worked in the past might not necessarily work as well in the future.”

Contact

Theo Stein, 720-391-0163

Those scented products you love? NOAA study finds they can cause air pollution


ABSTRACT: A gap in emission inventories of urban volatile organic compound (VOC) sources, which contribute to regional ozone and aerosol burdens, has increased as transportation emissions in the United States and Europe have declined rapidly. A detailed mass balance demonstrates that the use of volatile chemical products (VCPs)—including pesticides, coatings, printing inks, adhesives, cleaning agents, and personal care products—now constitutes half of fossil fuel VOC emissions in industrialized cities. The high fraction of VCP emissions is consistent with observed urban outdoor and indoor air measurements. We show that human exposure to carbonaceous aerosols of fossil origin is transitioning away from transportation-related sources and toward VCPs. Existing U.S. regulations on VCPs emphasize mitigating ozone and air toxics, but they currently exempt many chemicals that lead to secondary organic aerosols.

Volatile chemical products emerging as largest petrochemical source of urban organic emissions

0 comments :

 

Blog Template by Adam Every . Sponsored by Business Web Hosting Reviews