A sign in Turlock, California reads 'Pray for Rain 1 Thess 5:17'. Water scarcity has had a severe effect on energy production in Turlock, as well as agriculture. Photo: Justin Sullivan / Getty Images

By Dave Tickner   
21 March 2014

(Guardian Professional) – All hydro, no power?

Yesterday afternoon I made a list. I'd like to share it with you: Alon, Solar Alliance, Eskom, GDF Suez, Iberdrola, Ranhill Berhad, Sasol. Can you guess what it's about? If not, don't fret. All will be revealed.

I made the list while perusing the website of the CEO Water Mandate. The Mandate, part of the UN Global Compact, was established in 2007 "to assist companies in the development, implementation, and disclosure of water sustainability policies and practices". It's the most prominent of the various global platforms which aim to help businesses to understand and address water-related risks.

As of yesterday, the CEO Water Mandate website listed 74 signatory companies. The seven companies I've listed above were, as far as I could tell, the only signatories from the energy sector.

By way of comparison, I counted more than 20 companies on the list from the agriculture, food and beverage sector and about a dozen from the pulp and paper industry. This got me thinking, as I seem to do quite often lately, about the food-water-energy "nexus" (a terrible word but it's all the rage now; I'd be delighted if someone can suggest a better alternative). Specifically, I found myself wondering whether the energy sector has fully grasped the potential implications of this 21st century resource trilemma.

In a recent blog, Diego Rodriguez and Marcelino Madrigal from the World Bank set out the impacts water scarcity could have on energy production. They listed shut-downs, expensive refits and capacity reductions which had hit power plants in Australia, South Africa, the US and India.

Reuters recently reported energy price hikes and possible power rationing in Brazil as a result of drought. Analysis by the International Energy Agency adds further weight to the call for water and energy planners to spend more quality time together. The IEA reckons that water use by the energy sector will rise dramatically in the next few decades and that access to water could be a challenge for power generators in many countries.

The risks are here and now, and they are likely to intensify. As an aside, the IEA analysis concluded that development pathways focused on energy efficiency, solar PV and wind power wouldn't intensify water needs substantially, an assessment backed up by recent research from the universities of Newcastle and Oxford: a win-win for energy, for water security and for global sustainability.

So is the sector being complacent? In most countries, energy generation has been regarded historically as a strategic priority when it comes to water allocation, for understandable reasons: if there's no power, economies grind to a standstill. But as the world gets thirstier, and water use trade-offs become more painful, this may not always be the case in the future. [more]

The energy sector is lagging behind on water challenges


  1. Anonymous said...

    Yep. Prayer is infinitely easier then reducing your carbon footprint, or walking to work, or staying home, or actively trying to stop climate change.

    This way, we can blame God when the prayers (never) work. If it doesn't rain, well then, it's His fault. If it does rain, well then, it's also His doing. That way, we "prove" God exists whether it rains or not!

    There's something to be said to keep the population dumb, superstitious and beleiving in magical fairy tales (much easier to control).  


Blog Template by Adam Every . Sponsored by Business Web Hosting Reviews