Insurance losses from U.S. extreme weather disasters, 2011-2012. Worsening weather in a warming world poses a growing risk to the financial stability of insurance companies and has broad ramifications for the economy and society.

Contact: Peyton Fleming,, 617-247-0700 x 120, 617-733-6660
20 September 2012

Worsening weather in a warming world poses a growing risk to the financial stability of insurance companies and has broad ramifications for the economy and society, according to a new report.

Stormy Future for U.S. Property and Casualty Insurers: The Growing Costs and Risks of Extreme Weather Events, a new report from Ceres, outlines a proactive approach insurers, regulators and investors can take to address climate change risks. Scientific evidence shows that climate change is contributing to stronger, more frequent heat waves, drought, and extreme precipitation events.

"The report makes clear that extreme weather losses are escalating and pose enormous challenges for U.S. insurers that they should pay far more attention to,” said Mindy Lubber, president of Ceres, a nonprofit group advocating for sustainability leadership from businesses and investors. “A small number of insurers have stepped to the plate in mobilizing a response to this global threat, but far broader engagement and action from the industry is needed.”

“Insurance is the first line of defense against extreme weather losses, but climate change is a game-changer for the models that insurers have long relied on,” said Washington State Insurance Commissioner Mike Kreidler, who wrote the report foreword and endorsed its key recommendations. “Companies will need to adapt if insurance is to remain available and affordable.”

Insurance commissioners in Washington, California and New York already require major insurers to disclose their potential exposure and strategies for dealing with climate change risks. Such mandatory disclosure is among a dozen recommendations in the report for insurance companies, insurance regulators and investors.

This summer’s devastating drought and record high temperatures are the latest reminders of the impacts that climate change and extreme weather events pose to U.S. property and casualty insurers. Last year’s spate of extreme weather, including damaging floods, heat waves, hailstorms and tornadoes across much of the interior U.S., contributed to net underwriting losses of $34 billion and the most credit downgrades in a single year since 2005, the year Hurricane Katrina hit the Gulf Coast.

While 2012 private insured losses so far are lower, total economic losses due to extreme weather have been no less troubling this year. The drought alone is expected to cost insurers roughly $20 billion, with most of those costs being borne by the federal crop insurance program. However, more than $5 billion will also be paid by private insurers.

While the insurance industry has begun to recognize the potential impacts of climate change and to evaluate its likely effects on their business, significant challenges remain. Some leading insurers and reinsurers are promoting new products and policies that will help reduce carbon pollution, which is driving climate change. Others are focused on building stronger resiliency to climate impacts, especially sea level rise, stronger storms and extreme precipitation events.

“Just as the insurance industry asserted leadership to minimize building fire and earthquake risks in the 20th century, the industry has a huge opportunity today to lead in tackling climate change risks,” Lubber said.

“Extreme weather events will grow in number and/or severity because of climate change,” said Kerry Emanuel, a climate scientist at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, a report reviewer. “U.S. average temperatures have risen over the past 50 years, and this year alone there have been more than 25,000 new record highs set.”

Ceres’ analysis is based on a careful review of U.S. property/casualty insurance industry financial results as reported by A.M. Best Company earlier this year.

The report recommends that insurance companies do a better job evaluating and pricing changing weather risks in their underwriting. This means developing and using more robust research and new catastrophe models that better reflect the latest science on extreme weather. And if insurance companies want to keep markets viable and affordable, they must exert more influence on where and how buildings and infrastructure are built in order to reduce vulnerability to growing weather extremes.

In the long term, the report says, the insurance industry should advocate for government policies that will accelerate cleaner energy while reducing carbon emissions.

State regulators have a role to play as well. Ceres recommends state insurance commissioners strengthen mandatory climate risk disclosure by expanding the number of states participating, and by clarifying disclosure expectations. State regulators should also build climate risk considerations into the financial oversight process.

Ceres recommends that investors and rating agencies encourage insurers to improve disclosure of climate change risks, opportunities and response strategies, in a manner consistent with disclosure mandates already in place in New York, Washington and California.

“As a long-term investor, CalSTRS is dedicated to making sure climate change is factored into the regular risk management practices of our portfolio companies, especially those in the insurance industry,” said Jack Ehnes, chief executive officer of the California State Teachers’ Retirement System (CalSTRS), a leading U.S. investor who spoke at today’s news conference. “By integrating climate change risk management into their practices, insurance companies greatly improve their abilities to offer sustained shareholder value.”

U.S. Insurance Companies Vulnerable to Extreme Weather, Changing Climate


  1. Anonymous said...

    Overall, I really dislike, even despise "insurance" companies, due to the fact that they are making money off of people's fear and potential suffering.

    Premiums are designed to maximize insurance company profits -- not "serve" their clients.

    Mandatory insurance laws are designed to ensure that insurance is forced upon everyone, again for the benefit of the insuring company, not the "insured".

    The proof of this is demonstrated when you file a claim. The insurance claim may be denied, downgraded or you may even be suddenly dropped as a "bad risk", even if this is the only claim in 30 years of driving for example, even if the fault is not yours.

    Clearly, the insurance company isn't about "insuring you", but ensuring that they maximize their profit margins.

    So I don't give a rats ass how much these low-life bastards have to pay out, they've ripped off the rest of us for decades.  


Blog Template by Adam Every . Sponsored by Business Web Hosting Reviews